Difference between revisions of "Talk:CETAF Specimen Preview Profile (CSPP)"
From CETAF Identifiers Wiki
m |
m |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<!-- … --> | <!-- … --> | ||
</syntaxhighlight> | </syntaxhighlight> | ||
| − | … which contains baffling RDF, because there is no <code><nowiki><dwc:kindOfMaterial>PreservedSpecimen</dwc:kindOfMaterial></nowiki></code> | + | … which contains baffling RDF, because there is no definition of <code><nowiki><dwc:kindOfMaterial>PreservedSpecimen</dwc:kindOfMaterial></nowiki></code>, I can find—is there or is it yet to be defined somewhere the <code><nowiki>dwc:kindOfMaterial</nowiki></code>? |
| + | |||
| + | I myself have difficulties to understand the CSPP proposal on one side and the mapping to the equivalent (classical) RDF on the other side, given no further documentation (yet). We should more clarify by example the relation of CSPP and classical RDF; or I have not understood it yet. --[[User:Andreas Plank|Andreas Plank]] ([[User talk:Andreas Plank|talk]]) 13:09, 26 November 2019 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 14:04, 26 November 2019
Relations of CETAF Specimen Preview Profile (CSPP) and expressed RDF somewhat baffling
From analysing returned RDF (e.g. http://id.snsb.info/snsb/collection/97112/153455/93009 accessed on 26th November 2019) we get the RDF, e.g. on Linux by
wget --quiet --header='Accept: application/rdf+xml' --header='Content: application/rdf+xml' --output-document="id.snsb.info⁄snsb⁄collection⁄97112⁄153455⁄93009.rdf" "http://id.snsb.info/snsb/collection/97112/153455/93009"
… and find in the RDF file:
<!-- … -->
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://id.snsb.info/snsb/collection/97112/153455/93009"><!-- OK -->
<dc:title>Erysiphe cruciferarum Opiz ex L. Junell</dc:title><!-- OK -->
<dwc:collectionCode>BSMeryscoll</dwc:collectionCode><!-- OK -->
<dwc:collectionID>3</dwc:collectionID><!-- OK -->
<dwc:datasetName>The Erysiphales Collection at the Botanische Staatssammlung München</dwc:datasetName><!-- OK -->
<dc:relation>http://www.botanischestaatssammlung.de/DatabaseClients/BSMeryscoll/About.cfm</dc:relation><!-- OK -->
<dwc:kindOfMaterial>PreservedSpecimen</dwc:kindOfMaterial><!-- baffling: who defines dwc:kindOfMaterial ?-->
<dc:type>PreservedSpecimen</dc:type><!-- ?OK -->
</rdf:Description>
<!-- … -->
… which contains baffling RDF, because there is no definition of <dwc:kindOfMaterial>PreservedSpecimen</dwc:kindOfMaterial>, I can find—is there or is it yet to be defined somewhere the dwc:kindOfMaterial?
I myself have difficulties to understand the CSPP proposal on one side and the mapping to the equivalent (classical) RDF on the other side, given no further documentation (yet). We should more clarify by example the relation of CSPP and classical RDF; or I have not understood it yet. --Andreas Plank (talk) 13:09, 26 November 2019 (CET)
