Standards compliance dashboard

From CETAF Identifiers Wiki
Revision as of 12:52, 21 January 2020 by Roger Hyam (Talk | contribs) (Dashboard)

Jump to: navigation, search

Introduction

The goal of this webpage is to provide an overview of the use of different (biodiversity) standards within the institutes. The dashboard is created in the framework of work package 4 of Synthesys+.

The table contains a list of standards (columns) and institutes (rows). Whenever an institute is using one of the standards, the corresponding cell is colored yellow. For some of the standards, extra information is given in the cell (level of adopting the standard or version of the standard used).

List of standards

The different standards considered in this dashboard are listed here. Links to a more detailed description on the standard are given.

This list of standards is not exhaustive and this is definitely not a complete overview. In a first version of this dashboard, we focus on some of the more widely used/known standards. A larger overview of the different standards can be found at FAIRsharing.org. In case another (important) standard is supported and missing from the list, don't hesitate to propose an addition.

Dashboard

Standards compliance dashboard
Institute Acronym CETAF ID IIIF DwC ABCD2 ABCD3 AC BCO DELTA ABCDEFG SDD
NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM (London) NHM L2
NATURHISTORISCHES MUSEUM WIEN (Vienna) NHMW L0
ZOOLOGISCHES FORSCHUNGSMUSEUM ALEXANDER KOENIG (Bonn) ZFMK L3
HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO (Finland) LUOMUS L3
MUSEUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE (Paris) MNHN L3
THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM (Israel) HUJI
NATURHISTORISKA RIKSMUSEET (Stockholm) NRM L0
AGENTSCHAP PLANTENTUIN MEISE (Meise) BGM L3 v2.1
FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN BGBM L3 v2.1
AGENCIA ESTATAL CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS (Madrid) CSIC
MUSEUM FUR NATURKUNDE (Berlin) MfN L3
ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH RBGE L3 v3.0 DwC Archive
ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS KEW RBGK L3?
INSTITUT ROYAL DES SCIENCES NATURELLES DE BELGIQUE (Brussels) RBINS L0
MUSEE ROYAL DE L'AFRIQUE CENTRALE (Tervuren) RMCA L1
SENCKENBERG GESELLSCHAFT FUR NATURFORSCHUNG (Frankfurt) SGN L0
STAATLICHES MUSEUM FUER NATURKUNDE STUTTGART SMNS L1
STAATLICHE NATURWISSENSCHAFTLICHE SAMMLUNGEN BAYERNS SNSB L3

Adoption of the CETAF stable identifier

A full overview on the adoption of the CETAF stable identifier can be found here. This document contains the syntax that is used by the different institutes.

In the table above, the level of adoption of the CETAF stable identifier is indicated. The levels are defined as follows:

  • Level 0: Identifier syntax chosen
  • Level 1: Web page for each specimen, identifier redirects to it[1]
  • Level 2: Machine readable representation for each specimen, accept-type[2] aware redirection
  • Level 3: Machine readable representation is CSPP conform

Extra information

This section will provide the possibility to detail more on the adoption of the different standards.

NHM

NHMW

  • IIIF: implemented through the JACQ system

LUOMUS

BGM

BGBM

RBGE

  • IIIF: Specific webpage provides a summary on the IIIF work

ZFMK

SGN

  • ABCD2: publishing to GBIF

SMNS

  • ABCD2: publishing to GBIF, BOLD, Genbank, UNITE, MycoBank, TreeBASE, VertNet.

RMCA

SNSB

  • CETAF-ID: ***, Example: UNIT GUID http://id.snsb.info/snsb/collection/97112/153455/93009 resolves to Unit ID: <Barcode> / 153455 / 93009, see SNSB RDF Service **http://services.snsb.info/***
  • DwC: the standard is used as Simple Darwin Core Text for publishing regional taxonomic lists with common names to GBIF.
  • ABCD: the standard is used for publishing specimen and observational data to GBIF, BioCASe, GFBio (German Federation for Biological Data) as well as various Special Interest Networks.
  • SDD: the standard is used for publishing trait and other kind of descriptive data via GFBio; data management done via DiversityDescriptions; SDD via NaviKey is used for taxonomic keys

Technical Notes

  1. If a redirect is implemented it should be the HTTP response status code 303 “See Other” instead of the sometimes used 302 code “Found” or “Moved Temporarily” which is hard to tell how the client would interpret it
  2. An identifier with header of 'application/rdf+xml' will be redirected to the objects machine-readable RDF metadata record (you can test this by using the CETAF URI Tester)