Difference between revisions of "Standards compliance dashboard"
From CETAF Identifiers Wiki
(→Dashboard: Completing for Meise Botanic Garden) |
(adding information provided so far) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* [http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/BCO Biological Collections Ontology (BCO)] | * [http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/BCO Biological Collections Ontology (BCO)] | ||
* [https://www.delta-intkey.com/ DEscription Language for TAxonomy (DELTA)] | * [https://www.delta-intkey.com/ DEscription Language for TAxonomy (DELTA)] | ||
| + | * [http://www.geocase.eu/efg ABCDEFG (Access to Biological Collection Databases Extended for Geosciences)] | ||
This list of standards is not exhaustive. A larger overview of the different standards can be found at [https://fairsharing.org/ FAIRsharing.org]. In case another standard is supported and missing from the list, don't hesitate to propose an addition. | This list of standards is not exhaustive. A larger overview of the different standards can be found at [https://fairsharing.org/ FAIRsharing.org]. In case another standard is supported and missing from the list, don't hesitate to propose an addition. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
! scope="col" style="width: 50px;" | BCO | ! scope="col" style="width: 50px;" | BCO | ||
! scope="col" style="width: 50px;" | DELTA | ! scope="col" style="width: 50px;" | DELTA | ||
| + | ! scope="col" style="width: 50px;" | ABCDEFG | ||
|- | |- | ||
! NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM (London) | ! NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM (London) | ||
| Line 34: | Line 36: | ||
! style="background: yellow;"|L2 | ! style="background: yellow;"|L2 | ||
! | ! | ||
| − | ! | + | ! style="background: yellow;"| |
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 44: | Line 47: | ||
! NHMW | ! NHMW | ||
! | ! | ||
| − | ! style="background: yellow;"| | + | ! style="background: yellow;"| L0 |
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! style="background: yellow;"| | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 58: | Line 62: | ||
! | ! | ||
! style="background: yellow;"| | ! style="background: yellow;"| | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 65: | Line 70: | ||
! HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO (Finland) | ! HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO (Finland) | ||
! LUOMUS | ! LUOMUS | ||
| − | ! style="background: yellow;"| | + | ! style="background: yellow;"|L3 |
| − | + | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! style="background: yellow;"| | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 79: | Line 85: | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 90: | Line 97: | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 101: | Line 109: | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 112: | Line 121: | ||
! style="background: yellow;"| v2.1 | ! style="background: yellow;"| v2.1 | ||
! style="background: yellow;"| | ! style="background: yellow;"| | ||
| + | ! N/A | ||
! N/A | ! N/A | ||
! N/A | ! N/A | ||
| Line 124: | Line 134: | ||
! | ! | ||
! style="background: yellow;"| | ! style="background: yellow;"| | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 134: | Line 145: | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 145: | Line 157: | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 156: | Line 169: | ||
! style="background: yellow;"|v3.0 | ! style="background: yellow;"|v3.0 | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 167: | Line 181: | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 178: | Line 193: | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 189: | Line 205: | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 201: | Line 218: | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 212: | Line 230: | ||
! | ! | ||
!style="background: yellow;"| | !style="background: yellow;"| | ||
| + | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
| Line 230: | Line 249: | ||
=Extra information= | =Extra information= | ||
This section will provide the possibility to detail more on the adoption of the different standards. | This section will provide the possibility to detail more on the adoption of the different standards. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == NHM == | ||
| + | * Example of CETAF ID: [http://data.nhm.ac.uk/object/8846cc56-b2f3-4e0a-9a43-6c75dfd27724 http://data.nhm.ac.uk/object/<id>] | ||
| + | * DwC is used when data is published to the [http://data.nhm.ac.uk data portal] | ||
== NHMW== | == NHMW== | ||
* IIIF: implemented through the [https://herbarium.univie.ac.at/database/search.php JACQ] system | * IIIF: implemented through the [https://herbarium.univie.ac.at/database/search.php JACQ] system | ||
| + | |||
| + | == LUOMUS == | ||
| + | * Example of CETAF ID [http://id.luomus.fi/GP.92702 http://id.luomus.fi/<id>] | ||
| + | * DwC is used to publish | ||
== BGM== | == BGM== | ||
Revision as of 15:24, 14 January 2020
Contents
Introduction
The goal of this webpage is to provide an overview of the use of different (biodiversity) standards within the institutes. The dashboard is created in the framework of work package 4 of Synthesys+.
List of standards
- CETAF persistent identifier
- IIIF
- Darwin Core (DwC)
- Access to Biological Collection Data v2.06 (ABCD2)
- Access to Biological Collection Data v3.0 (ABCD3)
- Audubon Core (AC)
- Biological Collections Ontology (BCO)
- DEscription Language for TAxonomy (DELTA)
- ABCDEFG (Access to Biological Collection Databases Extended for Geosciences)
This list of standards is not exhaustive. A larger overview of the different standards can be found at FAIRsharing.org. In case another standard is supported and missing from the list, don't hesitate to propose an addition.
Dashboard
| Institute | Acronym | CETAF ID | IIIF | DwC | ABCD2 | ABCD3 | AC | BCO | DELTA | ABCDEFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM (London) | NHM | L2 | ||||||||
| NATURHISTORISCHES MUSEUM WIEN (Vienna) | NHMW | L0 | ||||||||
| ZOOLOGISCHES FORSCHUNGSMUSEUM ALEXANDER KOENIG (Bonn) | ZFMK | L3 | ||||||||
| HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO (Finland) | LUOMUS | L3 | ||||||||
| MUSEUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE (Paris) | MNHN | L3 | ||||||||
| THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM (Israel) | HUJI | |||||||||
| NATURHISTORISKA RIKSMUSEET (Stockholm) | NRM | L0 | ||||||||
| AGENTSCHAP PLANTENTUIN MEISE (Meise) | BGM | L3 | v2.1 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| FREIE UNIVERSITAET BERLIN | BGBM | L3 | v2.1? | |||||||
| AGENCIA ESTATAL CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS (Madrid) | CSIC | |||||||||
| MUSEUM FUR NATURKUNDE (Berlin) | MfN | L3 | ||||||||
| ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH | RBGE | L3 | v3.0 | |||||||
| ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS KEW | RBGK | L3? | ||||||||
| INSTITUT ROYAL DES SCIENCES NATURELLES DE BELGIQUE (Brussels) | RBINS | |||||||||
| MUSEE ROYAL DE L'AFRIQUE CENTRALE (Tervuren) | RMCA | L1 | ||||||||
| SENCKENBERG GESELLSCHAFT FUR NATURFORSCHUNG (Frankfurt) | SGN | |||||||||
| STAATLICHES MUSEUM FUER NATURKUNDE STUTTGART | SMNS | L1 |
Adoption of the CETAF stable identifier
A full overview on the adoption of the CETAF stable identifier can be found here. This document contains the syntax that is used by the different institutes.
In the table above, the level of adoption of the CETAF stable identifier is indicated. The levels are defined as follows:
- Level 0: Identifier syntax chosen
- Level 1: Web page for each specimen, identifier redirects to it[1]
- Level 2: Machine readable representation for each specimen, accept-type[2] aware redirection
- Level 3: Machine readable representation is CSPP conform
Extra information
This section will provide the possibility to detail more on the adoption of the different standards.
NHM
- Example of CETAF ID: http://data.nhm.ac.uk/object/<id>
- DwC is used when data is published to the data portal
NHMW
- IIIF: implemented through the JACQ system
LUOMUS
- Example of CETAF ID http://id.luomus.fi/<id>
- DwC is used to publish
BGM
- CETAF-ID: http://www.botanicalcollections.be/specimen/<barcode>
- IIIF: an exemplar implementation is made. An instance of the Mirador viewer can be found here. A RESTful API is developed to generate the IIIF manifests on the fly: http://iiif-manifest.oxalis.br.fgov.be/specimen/<barcode>/manifest. At the moment, manifests are only generated based on the barcode. The IIIF 2.1 APIs (image and presentation) are implemented. The image API is provided by the Loris server and the source images are in JPG format.
- DwC: this standard is used to publish data to e.g. GBIF
BGBM
- CETAF-ID: [herbarium.bgbm.org/object/B200012401 herbarium.bgbm.org/object/<barcode>]
- IIIF: https://herbarium.bgbm.org/data/iiif/<barcode>/manifest.json
RBGE
- IIIF: Specific webpage provides a summary on the IIIF work
ZFMK
- CETAF-ID: https://id.zfmk.de/collection_ZFMK/<barcode>
- ABCD2: publishing to GBIF, GGBN
- IIIF: under development...
SMNS
- ABCD2: publishing to GBIF, BOLD, Genbank, UNITE, MycoBank, TreeBASE, VertNet.
Technical Notes
- ↑ If a redirect is implemented it should be the HTTP response status code 303 “See Other” instead of the sometimes used 302 code “Found” or “Moved Temporarily” which is hard to tell how the client would interpret it
- ↑ An identifier with header of '
application/rdf+xml' will be redirected to the objects machine-readable RDF metadata record (you can test this by using the CETAF URI Tester)
